The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure illustrates information about weekly usage of fish and various kinds of meat for each person in gram in a period of time, from 1979 to 2004.
As graph shows, chicken and lamb had approximately an equal amount of consumption of consumption at the beginning of the year 1979, and then chicken consumption soared steadily up to the year 2004. Furthermore, lamb became less popular than chicken and the weekly usage of it decreased until the year 2004 to almost 150 grams for each person per week. However, it seems that the most popular meat was the beaf at the beginning of the year 1979, but after some fluctuations it lost its position by a decreasing slope on top of lamb by the year 2004. Therefore, chicken grasped the first place among all meat and fish in the year 2004.
The fish consumption had almost a steady declining slope between the year 1979 to 2004. Also, it began by 60 grams per person in the year 1979 and ended by 40 grams by the year 2004. Therefore, the most unpopular stuff was fish among all of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ds of meat for each person in gram in a period of time, from 1979 to 2004. As graph shows, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of consumption'.
Suggestion: of consumption
... lamb had approximately an equal amount of consumption of consumption at the beginning of the year 1979, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53723404255 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43314292071 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494680851064 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4177030527 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180438493895 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968306911378 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581585578028 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144849838514 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187583373707 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.