The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the proportion of consumption four type of meat, fish, lamb, chicken and beef in the year 1997 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that beef is the most popular used meat in the year (1997-1989)and fish is very less popular used meat in all year 1997 to 2004 in European country.
Firstly, in the year between 1997 to 1989 beef is most useful meat in European country grams per week around (150-200). In the same year chicken and lamb both are approximately same (100-150) grams per week. Fish is very less used in the year 1997-1989 around 50 grams per week.
Secondly, after the year 1989 chicken is most useful meat in European country respectively 250 grams per week. And the same situation lamb and beef both are same used after 1989 around (100-150) grams per week in European country. Fish is same position used after the 1989 in European country 50 grams per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | dhruvalpatel | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | dhruvalpatel | 69 | view |
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have scar a television and a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 67
- The chart below shows the percentages of industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004 67
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24651640045 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 64.0 106.607317073 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2947180048 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226091306284 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133279587653 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870091795804 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181659519667 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642169649867 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.01 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.