The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates changes in the amount of beef, lamb and fish consumed in a particular European country between 1979 and 2004.
A quick glance at the graph reveals that how the consumption of chicken increased dramatically while the popularity of these other foods decreased over the period.
The consumption of chicken showed an upward trend, increasing from just under 150 grams in 1979 until it overtook the consumption of lamb in 1980 and beef in 1989. By 2004 it had soared to almost 250 grams per person per week, which was the highest rate of all.
On the other hand, during 25 years of the period, the consumption of beef, lamb and fish followed a downward trend. In 1979, beef was by far the most popular in these foods, with about 225 grams consumed per person per week. After 10 years period of the erratic fluctuation, its figure fell tremendously to approximately 100 grams in 2004. Similarly, lamb consumption declined sharply over the whole timescale, ending the period at a level one-third its amount in the first year, namely around 50 grams. The consumption of fish also decreased but less significantly, beginning over a little 50 grams in 1979 and then its amount changed plus or minus 10 grams throughout the period.
Noticeably, the period 1979-2004, although other types of food experienced changes, fish remained the least popular food.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68024456905 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0593791503 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165106724792 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073403573271 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548234066815 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112169037751 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505664647998 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.