The line graph illustrates’ about four kinds of meat (chicken, beef, lamb, fish) consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004. The consumption is measured in grams.
Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased over the period given, while for chicken it rose. The amount of fish consumed almost remained constant except for a slight dip in the initial years. At the start of the period, beef was the most popular meat, which was replaced by chicken from 1989 to 2004.
From the chart, it is evident that, in 1979 beef was consumed at a rate of around 210 grams per person per week which had some considerable fluctuations before shrinking to over 100 grams per person. Chicken was one of the least preferred meat earlier. But, in no time it crossed lamb in consumption rate which was just below the beef and eventually outnumbered beef before reaching the top of 250 grams per person per week.
We can also observe that, fish was the least consumed one among all others and had been almost constant below 50 grams except for the earlier years after 1979.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77127659574 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4470108612 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6820152191 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153291425098 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752471221831 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668857614127 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118895616043 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836209012692 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.