The diagram compares the amount of four different types of meat and fish eaten in European country from 1979 to 2004.
At first glance, it is noticeable that the figures for beef, lamb and fish witnessed a decrease over the timescale, while only the consumption of chicken rose gradually. Also, although beef ranked first in the beginning, it was overtaken by chicken towards in the end of the survey.
In 1979, lamp and chicken shared almost equal proportion at around 150 grams per person in a week. However, while the former dropped steadily and it reached just over 60 in the last year, the latter saw a remarkable growth and outstripped beef consumption in 1989 before reaching a high of around 250.
Beef stood at over 200 grams, while the figures for fish was a quarter as high as beef initially. Afterwards, beef consumption fluctuated until 1989 and falling dramatically to around a half as high as its original level in 2004. In contrast, there was just a small drop approximately 10 grams in fish consumption throughout the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85474860335 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69444068619 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1425667816 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122159960283 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606603950392 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708258635595 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957991221255 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085304348556 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.