The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph depicts the intact of Fish, chicken, lamb, and beef In the European nations between the year 1979 and 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that there was an uncertain consumption of meat where beef and lamb dramatically declined and the intake of chicken rose after the year 1989, and fish input remains constant.
In the beginning, beef consumption was at a peak and almost reached 230 Grams per week in the year 1984, nonetheless, the numbers started decreasing after 1987 where per week use of beef was at around 220 grams and subsequently it begins falling and ended up by 120 grams in the year 2004. Interestingly, per gram intake of fish almost remain similar from its beginning where it was at 52 Grams, and in the end, it drops by 2 to 4 Grams per week.
In the year 1979, the acceptance for both lamb and chicken remains exact among the citizens. However, around the year 1989 chicken surpassed per gram by 220, and then it significantly increased and dissolves in 2004 by 240 grams and it remains the most favorable among the Europeans. However, lamb started slumping its vogue from the year 1989 where people choose to eat at least 100 grams per week, and thereafter, It weakened by 53 grams per week consumption in the year 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge do disadvantages of the development for society outweigh the advantage 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK schools in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, then, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68918918919 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53974573856 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7563078388 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11832669419 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804759501045 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871821623007 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118628754107 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998452934094 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.