The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The line graph gives information about the consumption of four various types of meat in Gram per person in a week from 1979 to 2004. Different types of meat include Beef, Chicken, Lamb and Fish.

Overall, in the first few years, consumption of Beef was the highest and from around 1989 it has been replaced by Chicken. Fish was aways least popular meat.

People were consuming more than 200gm of Beef per week in 1979 and this quantity was fluctuating for almost 5 years. Then after 1984, it starts reducing and reached to over 100gm per week in 2004. Also, the quantity of eating Lamb’s meat has reduced from 150gm to almost 50gm in the period.

Chicken started from less than 150gm per week in 1979 and reached to over 250gm in 2004. Consumption of fish has started over 50gm in 1979 but reduced in the subsequent 2-3 years to 50 gm. It was then almost constant throughout the period.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'aways the least'.
Suggestion: aways the least
... has been replaced by Chicken. Fish was aways least popular meat. People were consuming ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27691368688 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 189.0 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4415834017 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194949801371 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863634272844 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628934836059 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13465020829 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729318216947 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.