The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of
meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph above illustrates the amount of fish and three other kinds of
meat namely lamb, beef and chicken that people of a European country
consumed during the period of 1979 and 2004. Overall, the consumption of
fish showed small degree of fluctuation; meanwhile, the figure for Lamb,
Beef and Chicken changed dramatically from the year of 1979 to 2004.
Starting with more than 50 grams for each individual per week in 1979, the
amount of Fish slightly declined for the next five years until 1984, followed
by fifteen years of stability. In 1999, this amount decreased a little and then
nearly remained unchanged until 2004.
21
However, Lamb and Beef consumption with very high starting points of 150
grams and more than 200 grams per person per week respectively
experienced many years of up and down and had the main tendency to
diminish up to the year of 2004. Unlike these two kinds of food, the
consumption of Chicken with a rather lower start than Lamb tended to soar
and reached its peak of more than 250 grams for each person a week in 2003
and stopped in 2004 with a small decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates the amount of fish an...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on with very high starting points of 150 grams and more than 200 grams per person...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36579837949 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548717948718 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2452319463 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.833333333 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193882965524 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108134056421 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811472214636 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657376914685 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054054418262 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.