The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...tical-align: inherit;'> khoảng 220 gram mỗi người mỗi tuần. ^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Giai đoạn từ 1979 đến 2004 đã chứng kiến ​​sự gia tăng đáng kể ^^^
Line 4, column 551, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...pos;vertical-align: inherit;'> 250 gram. ^^^^
Line 4, column 634, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...gn: inherit;'>Ngược lại, khoảng 60 gram thịt cừu ^^^^
Line 4, column 888, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le='vertical-align: inherit;'> , so với 40 gram cá năm 2004. Trong năm 2...
^^
Line 4, column 1216, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...đạt điểm cao nhất, tuy nhiên, ở mức 230 gram, con số này đã giảm nhanh chóng 110 gra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 0.0 33.7804878049 0% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3873.0 965.302439024 401% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 293.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 13.2184300341 4.92477711251 268% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.86657776281 2.65546596893 372% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423208191126 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 815.4 283.868780488 287% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.8 1.45097560976 193% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 22.4926829268 213% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 300.318534597 43.030603864 698% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 645.5 112.824112599 572% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.8333333333 22.9334400587 213% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 5.23603664747 6% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00505382263773 0.215688989381 2% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00520171365295 0.103423049105 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00291881448853 0.0843802449381 3% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00441456797763 0.15604864568 3% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00332909465307 0.0819641961636 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 65.3 13.2329268293 493% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -78.76 61.2550243902 -129% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 27.4 6.51609756098 420% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 36.2 10.3012195122 351% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 60.28 11.4140731707 528% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 44.5 11.4329268293 389% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.9970731707 193% => OK
text_standard: 45.0 11.0658536585 407% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.