The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph gives information about consumption of Margarine, Butter and Low far & reduced spreads from 1981 to 2007. Consumption is measured in ‘grams’ unit.

Overall, the consumption of butter has got decreased while Low fat and reduced spreads have surged from 1996 to 2001 then it has decreased in the subsequent period. Margarine was fluctuating from till 2001 then it reduced substantially in the next period.

Consumption of Margarine was fluctuating from 80 to 100 gram from 1981 to 2001 but reduced dramatically in the year 2007. It was constant in the period of 1991 to 1996. Consumption of butter has started over 140 grams and reached its peak, that is, 160 grams in 1986. It has decreased staidly until 2007.

On the other hand, the consumption of Low fat and reduced spreads has started in 1996 at around 10 grams and rose drastically over 80 grams in 2001. Then it decreased to approximately 70 gram in 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...argarine was fluctuating from 80 to 100 gram from 1981 to 2001 but reduced dramatica...
^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
.... Then it decreased to approximately 70 gram in 2007.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94339622642 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94509656039 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496855345912 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2208283123 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170791978243 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789853834753 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745373097259 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125547014831 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064324266355 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.