The line graph compares three regions, namely Australia, Canada, and the European Community, in terms of the wheat export index between 1985 and 1990.
Overall, while the amount of wheat exported in Canada and European countries had a tendency to increase at the end of the examined period, the opposite was true for Australia. Meanwhile, the data on Canadian wheat exports dramatically fluctuated rather than in the other areas.
Canada was the number-one country regarding exporting wheat over the period of the first 4 years with approximately 20 million tones in 1985. This figure slightly decreased after 1 year before reaching a peak at 25 million tones in 1988. Similarly, the year 1988 also witnessed a marginal rise in wheat exports in the European Community at 15 million tons after experiencing a declining period within the first 3 years. In contrast, the trend was reversed in the figure for Australia, with 15 million tons at the beginning of the period, then grew by only 1 million tons, followed by a substantial decline to 17 units in 1988.
Furthermore, from 1988 to 1990, there was a significant difference in the export index of wheat in 3 countries. While Australia continued to export less and ended up with around 10 million tons in 1990, the wheat imports from Canada tended to grow in 1989 and 1990, with 19 and 21 million tons, respectively. Besides that, the wheat production used for export in the European Community went through a huge fluctuation, starting with a sharp decrease and falling into the bottom at 14 million tons, and then increasing by 5 million tons to 19 million tons at the end of the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91039426523 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71336344463 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523297491039 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8595217872 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164339360448 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831937060716 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653056401417 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115498360452 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03532259298 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.