The chart illustrates how four means of transportation were used to commute to and from work in a particular European city from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the percentage of people travelling by train and by car, whereas, the figures for tube and bus dropped during the research period in the surveyed nation. Additionally, the proportion of car commuters experienced the most dramatical alteration.
In 1960, the rate of bus users was highest, at nearly 40%, while the figure for train was significantly lower, at about 18%. Meanwhile, the percentage of citizens travelling by tube accounted for around 17%, compared to only more than 5% of the total people in the city examined used car to commute.
In 2000, the share of car travelers considerably increased to about 37% and became the highest figure in the graph. Similar changes, but with lesser extent, can be seen in the figure for train, which grew to over 20%. By contrast, the percentage of people using tube and bus decreased to 25% and 15% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82767371462 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0762013728 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191707635607 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837176861859 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110621744199 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137821344045 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128683389264 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.