The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals the amount of air contaminants stemming from three different sources in the UK between 1990 and 2005. Overall, it is evident that the trends for all sources were downward over the period given. It can also be observed that a much larger volume of pollutants was emitted by the industry whereas households produced the least.
In 1990, the total atmosphere pollutants stood at 7 million tones, which experienced a decline to 4 million tonnes in 1999 and continued to dip to just over 3 million tonnes by the end of the period. Industry constituted 5.5 million tonnes of the air contaminants in 1990. There was then a drop to a figure of exactly 2 million tonnes with a sharp fall between 1993 and 1996.
In stark contrast, there were slight fluctuations in the figures for transport and households. While the former plateaued at around 1 million tonnes of air contaminants during a span of 15 years, the latter fell from roughly 1 million tonnes in 1990 to around 0.1 million tonnes in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph reveals the amount of air contaminants stemming ...
^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the total atmosphere pollutants stood at 7 million tones, which experienced a dec...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures for transport and households. While the former plateaued at around 1 million...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77401129944 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65521095826 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3323738931 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143288988608 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713213911161 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899200255109 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109051044512 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676734829234 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.