The chart represents changes in the fertility rates of female members
of the population (women) in six different Gulf countries, namely Saudi
Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar between 1990 and
2000. Overall it can be seen that, there were major falls in birth rates in all
(six) countries, although some countries in the region have (retain) much
higher fertility rates than others.
From 1990 to 2000, there was a drop in the number of children born
in all six countries. The most notable changes were in two nations, which
already had low rates of fertility at the beginning of the ten-year period, the
UAE and Bahrain.
There was a wide variation in birth rates between the six nations.
Oman and Saudi Arabia had the highest rates, with over seven births per
woman in 1990. This compared with around 4 births per woman in the UAE
and Bahrain, and only 3.75 in Kuwait
By the year 2000, the figures (numbers or rates) had dropped by over
25% in the UAE, which registered the same rate as (similar rates to)
Bahrain and Kuwait at under (below) three births per woman. Similarly, the
rates shrank by 20%, from 7.0 to 5.5. in (both) Oman and Saudi Arabia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'retained'.
Suggestion: retained
...hough some countries in the region have retain much higher fertility rates than other...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'figures'' or 'figure's'?
Suggestion: figures'; figure's
...y 3.75 in Kuwait By the year 2000, the figures numbers or rates had dropped by over 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 39, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... rates shrank by 20%, from 7.0 to 5.5. in both Oman and Saudi Arabia.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73429951691 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15883120498 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3083172294 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242796010515 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105474503916 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682648290232 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785282229799 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667757494142 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.