The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries
The given bar graph compares the fertility rate of women in six different gulf countries between 1990 and 2000.
It is clear that the fertility rate declined over the decade in all the countries. The number of births per woman in oman and saudi Arabia was higher than the other four countries.
In 1990, the average of births for each woman in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and UAE countries was between 3 to 4. On the other hand, oman women had the highest fertility rate, with 7 births per woman, closely followed by saudi arabian, with 6.7.
In 2000, although there was a slight declined in the fertility rate of a woman, oman and saudi arabian were still the countries which had the highest rates in births per woman, stood at 5.5. In the remain countries, the figures reduced to 2-3 by the year 2000.
To summarise, even though there was a decrease in the women fertility rates, oman and saudi arabian women continued to show a fairly higher fertility rate among the women in these 6 gulf countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 73
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s in births per woman, stood at 5.5. In the remain countries, the figures reduced to 2-3 b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70224719101 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28215081599 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522471910112 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.069804356 43.030603864 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.5 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34714324637 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189420022002 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160341610903 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22618445319 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146801482457 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.