The provided graph illustrates the data regarding the countries of residence of students in Australia from 1982 to 2000. The resident countries are Indonesia, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore.
It is clear from the chart that all trends were generally upward. At the beginning of the period, in 1982, the number of student from Singapore, Indonesia and Hong Kong were only zero, but figures grew to 19000, 23000 and 18000 according to the 2000's statistics, respectively. In contrast, Malaysian students included 5000 residents in the beginning and gradually rose to 17 000 till the end of the period. The number of students from Malaysia reached its peak of 18000 in 1998. In comparison, according to statistics, the figures of Indonesia and Hong Kong also peaked at 19000 and 27000 in the same year. After which, the general trend of decrease to 21000, 15000 and 16000 was faced by figures of Indonesia, Hong Kong and Malaysia. However, the figure of Singapore in the statistics did not decline, but steadily rose.
Overall, increasing in numbers was general trend in the statistics of overseas students coming in Australia, who came from the countries mentioned above.
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work https ielts simon com a 6a0120a5bb05d8970c01b8d0f4cae8970c 500wi 72
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the government of richer nation should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such area. 61
- Many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable to repay It should therefore be made more difficult for individuals to borrow large amounts of money What are your opinions on this 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e figure of Singapore in the statistics didnt decline, but gradually rose to 1900 in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12435233161 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71502590674 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6267034762 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984356565767 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455976953036 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648848453783 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111782762489 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633805330764 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.