The bar chart provides information on three different types of waste disposal in a European country over a period of four years from 2005. Units are measured in million tonnes.
It can be seen from the graph that in 2005, the amount of landfill method of disposal had the highest at 2000 million tonnes, while the method of burning was merely 900 million tonnes. Meanwhile, the figure for dumping in the sea was exactly 1200 million tonnes in this country.
However, the figure for both method of burning and dumping in ocean showed a slight increase, which rose almost 300 million tonnes growth in 2006. In contrast, the landfill method declined dramatically to 1600 million tonnes in 2006from a peak of 2000 million tonnes in 2005. By 2008, the trash disposal of dumping in the sea method hiked immediately to reach well under 600 million tonnes, while other two method of waste collection fell dramtically at 1200 million tonnes and 900 million tonnes respectively.
Overall, except the landfill disposal method,other given methods noticed an rising trend within given period in a European country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart provides information on th...
^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... years from 2005. Units are measured in million tonnes. It can be seen from the g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its are measured in million tonnes. It can be seen from the graph that in 20...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1200 million tonnes in this country. However, the figure for both method of b...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 900 million tonnes respectively. Overall, except the landfill disposal me...
^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , other
...all, except the landfill disposal method,other given methods noticed an rising trend w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...osal method,other given methods noticed an rising trend within given period in a E...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07103825137 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47941749672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4860934092 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19338045372 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877989830048 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106989116407 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139145060947 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980572839687 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.