The bar garph provides content about disposing waste by various methods namely landfills, burning and dumping in sea, in europe, between 2005 and 2008, units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, europeans decreased dumping waste in landfills and there was consistent escalation in dumping waste in sea in the given figure whereas, buring method of waste disposal fluctuated throughout the period.
Intially, landfills was most popular method of the year (2005) with 2000 million tonnes of waste disposed in landfills than, burning was least used for just 9 hundred million tonnes of garbage. In comparision with dumping waste in sea was little higher than buring at 1200 millions tonnes of units. In consecutive, usage of landfills fell for dumping waste by 400 million tonnes whereas, method of burning and sea dumping got popularity about 1100 and 1300 million tonnes, respectively.
By the end of the period, duming waste in sea was the only method who got popularity. Whilst, other two declined. In detail, sea dump rose around 1650 million tonnes, burning and landfills were about 850 and 1200, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...en 2005 and 2008, units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, europeans decreased...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ping waste in sea was little higher than buring at 1200 millions tonnes of units....
^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnes, respectively. By the end of the period, duming waste in sea was the only...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32402234637 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54916390888 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7880539251 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131145380302 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652500479223 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595826925976 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104082554891 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564865788567 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.