The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph represents about the number of books read by both men and women at Burnaby public library over 4 years.
The volumes read by both men and women followed different trends. In 2011, the number of books read by men increased steadily between 2011 to 2012 by 3000 to 4000 books. After 2012, the number rose dramatically and reach its peak by 14000 books till 2014. The number of books read by women gradually increased until 2013 by 10000 volumes before it receeded in 2014 by around 5000.
In 2011 the women started with 5000 books and end up with 8000. There is an Increase of 3000 books over four year period. On the other hand, men started with 3000 and ended them with 14000. Men increased the number of books by 11000.
Overall, women read more books than men at the beginning but in 2013 the number decreased. Aa a result, men only read more books comparetively with women between 2013 to 2014 .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...retively with women between 2013 to 2014 .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55688622754 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1321076278 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3530443834 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.1818181818 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321734551119 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145301802057 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801164527752 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228167811059 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074137365413 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.08 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.