The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates, the account of noise pollution complaints reached in environmental health authorities during 1980 to 1996 in the city of Newton.
Overall, road works reports a significant amount of noise pollution in Newton over 16 year period. Whereas, domestic and household noise complaints dramatically decrease over the years.
In 1980, complaints from traffic noise and road works was remained steadily over four years with 300 and 500 respectively. whilst, after 1984 both declined 100 count each then there was a rapid increase of road traffic noise reached to more than 1200 by 1996. similarly, road works also surged to their account from 200 in 1988 to 600 during the last year.
Likewise, the count of complaints regarding household noise was highest at beginning with more than 600, then there was a systematic decrease over the years such as, dip to 400 in 1984 reach 200 after ten years later the end of the period complaints level was the lowest rate which is barely 100. Moreover, complaints from factory began at 400 in 1984 escalated to 600 after two years then there was a relatively stable complaints with below 800 up to the last ear.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...ur years with 300 and 500 respectively. whilst, after 1984 both declined 100 count eac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...oise reached to more than 1200 by 1996. similarly, road works also surged to their accoun...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, then, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97969543147 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57939955593 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3950905039 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14430947471 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811355861242 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815726729873 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124743195022 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951008263218 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.