A glance at the graph provided reveals how many complaints to Environmental Health authorities due to different sectors in the Newtown during the period from 1980 to 1996.Overall, what stands out from the graph is that domestic noise trend saw significantly rise while road works figure witnessed dramatic decline over the period in question.
Looking at the details, the traffic noise and domestic house hold trend were similar to eachother over the period and both started at aroud 200 and 400, respectively then saw a considerably fluctiation before dramatic rise to 1200 and 600.
By contrast, road works rate started at aroud 600 then witnessed a gradually plunge which continued until 1996 to near 10 share.The factories figure started from 400 and grew ignificantly to 600 further rose to near 700 but more steply during 1986 and 1988 year. But the figure levelled off in 1990 which continued until 1996 without any fluctuation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aph provided reveals how many complaints to Environmental Health authorities due ...
^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...own during the period from 1980 to 1996.Overall, what stands out from the graph is that...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('plunge') instead of another adjective.
...ate started at aroud 600 then witnessed a gradually plunge which continued until 1996 to near 10 s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...h continued until 1996 to near 10 share.The factories figure started from 400 and ...
^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntil 1996 to near 10 share.The factories figure started from 400 and grew ignifi...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e factories figure started from 400 and grew ignificantly to 600 further rose to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13071895425 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73243265575 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.753369211 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.25 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.25 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101340798308 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580195966139 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638318588916 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704029667269 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691466330108 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.