The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
The line chart gives information about the number of foreign travelers in three areas in a particular European nation from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the coast was the most common place of tourist attraction, while mountainous areas had the opposite trend. Overseas people visiting lake areas had a downward trend.
In 1987, the figure for visiting coastal areas accounted for 40,000 visitors, compared to only 20,000 travelers visiting mountainous areas. 10,000 native visitors traveled to the mountains fewer than to the coast, at 35,000 and 25,000, respectively. In the next ten years, the coast had a significant increase in the number of foreign travelers by 25,000 visitors before outlooking the figure of lake traveling, whereas the number of mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001. People visiting the coast continually rose to over 75,000, and 35,000 foreign travelers visited the coast of this European country in 2007.
Experiencing the lake area had exactly 10,000 visitors in the first year and continually rose over the first fifteen years, peaking at 75,000 visitors in 2002. This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tinually rose to over 75,000, and 35,000 foreign travelers visited the coast of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32085561497 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66529128457 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5194188123 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180591654387 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896517384225 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639744792176 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134162525453 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694039368561 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.