The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The chart illustrates the changes in the number of visitors who traveled to one of the Caribbean islands from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total quantity of tourists steadily grew over the observation period. The same trend can be noticed for the visitors cruising on ships that overtook those staying on the island by a wide margin.
Turning to details, we can see that in 2010, the number of all travelers accounted for one million, of which the number of staying on the island was about 0.7 million and those cruising on ships nearly 0.3 million. The following year saw a rise in the total number and that of travelling by sea, yet there were no changes in the quantity of spending their holiday on the island. Until 2012, the trend continued for the whole number, but the tendency was reversed for the two types of travel, with the number visiting the island almost doubling yet with the number of going by ship nearly halving.
Between 2012 and 2017, the upward trend was characteristic of all statistics. The number of tourists was gradually increasing to surge to 3.5. Concerning visitors staying on the island, their number did not change significantly, getting a plateau of 1.5 with a drop in 2016 but recovering by the end. Likewise, the number of cruise ships' tourists showed a continuous increase ending with 2 million by 2017.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79310344828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54484160355 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1887893429 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283429296482 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124220318557 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065102207187 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179903988434 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742563923979 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.