The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the average tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Overall, the total number of tourists is increased than the number of tourists staying on a ship and staying on an island.The total number of tourist visits has increased from 1million to 3.5 million over the years, which is the highest result.
In 2010 the visitors staying on cruise ships formed 0.3 millions, like in 2012.The same result in 2011 and 2013 and amounted to half a million tourists.
After 2013, the number of visitors staying on cruise ships increased to half a million by 2014 and amounted to 1 million.Then, in 2015 the visitors increased again half a million that is formed 1.5 million.
The highest result visitors staying on cruise ships reached 2 million in 2017. Then the number of visitors staying on the island is not well developed, from 2010 to 2011 it was the same 0.7 million , in 2012 it increased by one million and reached 1.7 million, then in 2013 it increased again from 0.3 to 1.5 million and this result did not change untill 2016 and this year it decreased 0.3 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ying on a ship and staying on an island.The total number of tourist visits has incr...
^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ships formed 0.3 millions, like in 2012.The same result in 2011 and 2013 and amount...
^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...llion by 2014 and amounted to 1 million.Then, in 2015 the visitors increased again h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2010 to 2011 it was the same 0.7 million , in 2012 it increased by one million and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78756476684 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47978327969 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450777202073 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9055687715 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137390062964 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116836573917 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144900893224 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133815052285 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153263205866 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.