The graph below shows the percentage o f urban!suburb an and rural households in
a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar graph depicts the information about the rate of number people who used internet in cities or towns as well as countryside area during five years, from 1999 to 2004.
Firstly, in 1999, the internet was used with least number of people who live in villages as compared to urban area, who spent up to 10% time. After that the rate of internet access increased continuously in both parts between five years, in 2000, the metropolis of suburban area doubled in contrast of 1999 and a little rose in countryside area, then in 2002 the inhabitants of cities used half rate of internet, while in exurban it occurred a few changes. But in 2003, the proportion of countryside people reached at 25%, in contrast the suburban was approximately twice of the rural area. Lastly, in 2004, the growth of rate with tiny fraction in cities, whereas the 10% boosted in rural areas.
Overall, even though, the rate of internet suffering enlarged in both areas, but in exurban had less development occurred as compared to urbanized areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...Firstly, in 1999, the internet was used with least number of people who live in villages a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de area, then in 2002 the inhabitants of cities used half rate of internet, while...
^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...4, the growth of rate with tiny fraction in cities, whereas the 10% boosted in ru...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'lastly', 'then', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251231527094 0.268076937826 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.0985221674877 0.116061578633 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788177339901 0.0759168565197 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492610837438 0.0366838410393 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00492610837438 0.0131127313244 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.206896551724 0.155750635184 133% => OK
Participles: 0.0344827586207 0.0379272487307 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57921464565 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0197044334975 0.0210936926555 93% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0837438423645 0.0948980150116 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0147783251232 0.00967000014798 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1042.0 1161.00487805 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.9 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85393258427 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337078651685 0.337110787985 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247191011236 0.247514529752 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185393258427 0.171178102325 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0786516853933 0.112407865282 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57921464565 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.546246751206 103% => OK
Word variations: 49.1118646805 49.3433353143 100% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 29.6666666667 23.0094962315 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8930940687 42.9750493124 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 135.714022679 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 23.0094962315 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.689975730869 242% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 54.3857677903 47.7609492067 114% => OK
Elegance: 3.22580645161 2.94281807926 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222858693635 0.418131533498 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.271753194952 0.181151798455 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0550473264324 0.0850326197045 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.809937146522 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151685284887 0.157042692854 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144027630368 0.228904883108 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461237302026 0.108899403657 42% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.444495431067 0.367819155151 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0327189455291 0.0812612215331 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164098358091 0.316326947829 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584001092022 0.0921553760075 63% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
similarity_between_topicWord_text: 0.0340380307912 0.0546388062111 62% => OK
topic_distributions: 0.00990618556701 0.00991079747257 100% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 7.0 Out of 9