The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares the rate of part-time wage earners in four nations of the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) over two different years (1980 and 2010).
Overall, from 1980 to 2010, England, Scotland and Wales experienced a slight increase. However, in Northern Ireland, it witnessed a small decrease of part-time employees.
In 1980, 25% of the population of England worked part-time and it went up to over 30% in 2010. The country which had higher percentage was Wales, over 32% of its population worked part-time in 1980. In the next thirty years, the rate rose gradually, at around 35%.
Northern Ireland and Scotland were the two countries had lower rates. Especially, Northern Ireland experienced a slight drop, from 15% in 1980 to only about 13% in 1980. Besides, the percentage of part-time workers in Scotland escalated more considerably compared to England and Wales. In 1980, it only had 11% of the population chose part-time work but in 2010, the rate increased, at approximately 19%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-27 | Rudraksha surve | view | |
| 2021-06-18 | linhshaney112 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-27 | Rudraksha surve | view | |
| 2021-06-11 | baljit12 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | BHAVANI KESIREDDY | view |
- It is important for travellers and business people to understand the cultures they come into contact with however briefly What are the main advantages of doing so What do you think is the main disadvantage of not doing so 78
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetable diet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
- The table shows the average length of video advertisements on the Internet and the average length of time viewers spend watching them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 88
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The table shows the results of a survey of people s perception of celebrity news coverage Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74475768109 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.321079164 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215392585412 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095456783514 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514395837518 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145720332476 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228101675988 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.