The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares the proportion of people who went to the cinema in a country in Europe on a daily basis, in three different years( 2003, 2005 and 2007).
Overall, it is clear that people in this country tended to go to the cinema on the weekends. The largest amount of people who went to the theater on Saturday was who went to the movie on Saturday was higher, over the period show.
We can see that this country go to the cinema on Monday, at around 10%, in 2003. While, the number of movie-goers was increased significantly, to 40% for Saturday and 30% for Sunday.
Over the next four years, the percentage of people going to the cinema on the weekends was increased sharply from 42% to 33%, respectively. It is also noticeable that on Monday and on Tuesday become more popular among cinema-goers, with about 10% in 2007. However, the percentage who visited go to the cinema was lowest on Wednesday, with only 8%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e different years 2003, 2005 and 2007. Overall, it is clear that people in this...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rday was higher, over the period show. We can see that this country go to the c...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 40% for Saturday and 30% for Sunday. Over the next four years, the percentage...
^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...percentage who visited go to the cinema was lowest on Wednesday, with only 8%.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55089820359 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53803226976 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7314860628 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176784116957 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086428838991 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526526599842 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108523085957 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253766817514 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.