The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about the proportion of urban/suburban household that had internet connection in an European country over a five-year period between the years 2008 and 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant upward trend for the whole period in both urban/suburban and rural areas. The percentage in urban/suburban areas remained greater than the percentage in rural areas during the years shown on the graph.
In 2008, only 15% of homes in urban area had internet access, while less than 5% of rural homes had it. By the next year there was a considerable increase by about 15% in the urban/suburban homes, whereas in the rural homes it had increased slightly to just over 5%. In 2010, the percentage for urban/suburbarn house rose by about 10%, hit the highest point at 40%, making it four time as higher as the percentage in rural area. Over the next years, internet access continued to soar in both areas. Between 2011 and 2013 the amount of people with internet access in urban/suburnan areas remained steady at around 50%. In the meantime, the percentage of rural homes with internet connection continued climbing and reached 35% by 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...usehold that had internet connection in an European country over a five-year perio...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat there was a significant upward trend for the whole period in both urban/subur...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...suburban and rural areas. The percentage in urban/suburban areas remained greater...
^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onnection continued climbing and reached 35% by 2013.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98994974874 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86310474019 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.364063917 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332601348742 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141142605828 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601448031514 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232810214572 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474887485892 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.