The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrated how the pollution level in London is fluctuating for a 400 years. They are measured in micrograms per cubic meter.
Overall, the major contributors to rise the level of impurity are Smoke and Sulphur dioxide. In contrast to Smoke, Sulphur dioxide plays a major role because they have a huge amount of impact. Even though Smoke has a less impact in some years it has shown its greatest.
In 1600, both started with 0%. Smoke placed itself in the bottom. Sulphur dioxide has enlarged itself since 1600, had a surge dramatically and had a peak in many years. There were three years in which it touched its largest. But the highest out of them was in 1850. Smoke who had risen slowly, touched its good height in 1900. Both of them started to fluctuate after 1900. The decreasing rate was also at its full speed which ended up completely around 2000.
Clearly, London has experienced a worst situation before 20th Century than it is now. In comparison, it is very clear that Sulphur dioxide has played a crucial part in increasing the levels of pollution in London.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ause they have a huge amount of impact. Even though Smoke has a less impact in some years i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...000. Clearly, London has experienced a worst situation before 20th Century tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76439790576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43181177434 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623036649215 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0134888144 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.6666666667 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7333333333 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10642682853 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327506446457 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467791387513 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726555000289 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437749441007 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.44 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.