The line graph presented here represents the population growth of three counties in the state of Oregon, U.S between 1940 and 2000.
Overall, huge population growth can be seen in Washington county followed by steady pace increase of population in Yamhill and Columbia. The population boom in all the counties have started around 1970's with Washington having much higher growth rate than Yamhill and Columbia.
Washington being one of the largest counties of Oregon had a population of around 75 thousand in 1940s. In the next 30 year,i.e 1970s, the population only increased by 55 thousand and reached around 120 thousand only. With the advent of tech companies and growth in various fields of science a prominent growth has been observed in Washington with population reaching 240 thousand in 2000s and adding more than 120 thousand for this 30 year gap.
Yamhill and Columbia counties had a modest 30 thousand population at the start of 1940s. Both of these counties had a slow paced growth for the next 30 years and had reached a population of 45 thousand and around 40 thousand. For the next 30 years the population of Yamhill had significantly surpassed that of Columbia reaching 90 thousand as compared to only 75 thousand for Columbian County.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...hree counties in the state of Oregon, U.S between 1940 and 2000. Overall, huge...
^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1940s'.
Suggestion: in the 1940s
... had a population of around 75 thousand in 1940s. In the next 30 year,i.e 1970s, the pop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , i
...5 thousand in 1940s. In the next 30 year,i.e 1970s, the population only increased ...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...n with population reaching 240 thousand in 2000s and adding more than 120 thousand for t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04306220096 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66905031475 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2528946698 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128615703446 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840218418981 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950034715847 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132896812975 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121257762252 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.