The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the number of people in four various turtles ( leatherback, green, all species and olive ridley turtles) in India over 33 years between 1980 and 2012.

It is evident from the line graph that with regards to the count of people at the began were 100 in four different turtles in india and then peaked at approximately 130 by olive ridley turtles in 1998 after following the inconsistent trend, while population of leather back turtles followed downward trend dramatically and fell down to just under 60 after two decades and remains unchanged in the following two years.

Further analyzing, it is vivid from the graph that by 1984 both green turtles and all species had same population till 1993 after slight fluctuations. Additonally, all species had more population as compared to green turtles and reached to approximately 110 and around 90 respectively in 2012.

Overall, it can be stated that graph shows erratic trend in four type turtles over the given period of time in which the population of olive ridley turtles was more than other turtles, whilst leatherback turtles had less population during the given time period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turtles'' or 'turtle's'?
Suggestion: turtles'; turtle's
...es the number of people in four various turtles leatherback, green, all species and ol...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of people in four various turtles leatherback, green, all species and oliv...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...nchanged in the following two years. Further analyzing, it is vivid from the graph t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...end in four type turtles over the given period of time in which the population of olive ridley...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07853403141 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63777718534 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.047561834 43.030603864 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.0 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.2 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206199483253 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118895430092 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389815840894 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13276018592 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338073487354 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.