The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of three different types of fuel produced in a European country from 1981 to 2000.
Overall, petroleum was by far the most produced and fluctuated type of fuel while the manufacture of natural gas and coal experienced two completely opposite trends.
In 1981, the amount of petroleum being produced was around 100 tons. It increased steadily in the next few years to reach 130 tons and remained unchanged for 4 years before dropping back to just under 100 tons in 1989. It then rose up again to 130 tons in 1995, where it fluctuated slightly until it stayed at just over 120 tons at the end of the period.
The other two categories had the production remained constant at 80 tons of coal and 40 tons of natural gas, respectively. Coal production dropped down to around 50 tons in 1985 and rose back up to just over 70 tons in 1987 before slowly declining over the next 13 years to just under 40 tons. The manufacture of natural gas remained stable at about 40 tons until around 1991 when it began to increase sharply touching over 80 tons in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 61
- Nowadays entertainers get paid more than politicians What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive development 82
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 82
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59693877551 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47113174206 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2528407757 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786943177458 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048458825877 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732859549678 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797488555672 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929865558891 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.