The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particulur nation.
The line graph reveals the information about the percentage of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics that recycled between 1982 to 2010 in a nation. As an overview, paper and cardboard was the highest recycled material.
It is clear from the chart that, the recycling of paper and cardboard started in 1982 with almost 62% which was further observed some fluctuations in the next years and it reached to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% in the latter year. However, half of the glass containers recycled in the former year, after dipping to a low of 40% in 1990, the glass recycling rate gradually increased to 60% in 2010.
Moving towards the other materials, aluminium cans were first recycled in 1986 starting at about 5%, but this figure climbed rapidly over 25 years and by 2010 it had reached 45%. Furthermore, recycling of plastics was not introduced until 1990, although the growth in this category was constant it was very slow, rising from about 2% to around 8% over the period.
To sum up, the percentage of paper and cardboard that recycled was the highest of four classes of material, but this category experienced a decline after 1994. Whereas, there was continuing upward trends in the other materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e chart that, the recycling of paper and cardboard started in 1982 with almost 62...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...ations in the next years and it reached to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ched to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% in t...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rthermore, recycling of plastics was not introduced until 1990, although the grow...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...egory experienced a decline after 1994. Whereas, there was continuing upward trends in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95412844037 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58593568723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3910898927 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167268144866 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700324549724 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535014626318 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107667140202 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403683656482 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.