The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many percent of 4 distinct components were recycled between 1982 and 2010 in a certain country.
Overall, there was an increase in the recycling rate for plastics, glass containers, aluminum cans, and paper and cardboard with aluminum cans witnessing the most dramatic rise. In addition, the percentage of recycled paper and cardboard had the highest figures constantly during the years examined.
The proportion of paper and cardboard that are recycled started at the north of 60 percent after which it experienced a fluctuation in the range from 63 to 80 percent from 1982 to 1994, before suffering a gradual decline from 80 percent in 1994 and ending the period at 70 percent. An opposite change was seen in the figure for glass containers, which decreased from 50 percent in 1982 to 40 percent in 1990, followed by a steady growth to 60 percent at the end of the period.
About 2 percent of aluminum cans were recycled in 1986, with a subsequent increase to just over 20 percent in 2002, and a final dramatic rise to approximately 45 percent in 2010. The figure for plastics saw similar changes, starting at about 1 percent in 1990, hovering from a range which is under 10 percent until 2006, before ending the period at around 8 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83105022831 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6677141872 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543378995434 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0680493742 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993858526048 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592381938072 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451705214868 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783822081583 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465377992679 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.