The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph aims to compare 4 different ways to transport commodities in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, there was an increase in the quantities of goods transported by road, water, and pipeline with road witnessing the most dramatic rise, while the figure for rail saw a fluctuation. In addition, the number of products transported by road was the highest during the years examined.
About 70 million tonnes of stocks were transported by road in 1974, with a subsequent decrease to downward of 70 million tonnes, and a final rise to its peak at approximately 100 million tonnes in 2002. The figure for transporting by ships saw a similar change but to a lesser extent, starting from just under 40 million tonnes, hovering around 58 million tonnes, before reaching its peak at the north of 60 million tonnes.
The number of goods transported by pipeline started at around 5 million tonnes, after which it experienced a growth to roughly 18 million tonnes, before ending the period at about 20 million tonnes. Opposite changes can be seen in the figure for products transported by rail, which experienced a decline to around 30 million tonnes and fluctuated in range from 30 million tonnes to 35 million tonnes, before witnessing an increase to just over 40 million tonnes in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93150684932 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72746877599 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1521579083 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.285714286 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123759348763 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866653150004 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705312509131 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117855151676 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080522301045 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.