The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000, 2004 and 2007
The bar chart gives information about the proportion of inexhaustible energy per total supply in 4 different countries from 2000 to 2007.
Overall, Norway and Iceland had the percentage of renewable energy far higher than Germany and Australia. The figures of 4 countries were all increased over period of time.
In 2000, the proportion of inexhaustible energy in Norway was over 60% then steadily rose up to about 65% in 2004 and reached the peak of nearly 80% in 2007. Changing in similar trend, the figure of Germany was approximately 11% in 2000 then slightly increased to about 18% in 2007, this number however was much lower than Norway of roughly 4 folds.
Iceland and Australia had about 50% and 8% renewable energy of the total supply in 2004, the number after that went up to almost 60% and 10% in 2004 and all fell back to 55% and 9% in 2007. The figure of Iceland was approximately 5 times higher compared to Australia and 1,5 times lower than Norway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | ashkan zaheri | 87 | view |
| 2022-03-24 | tvaishnavi | 100 | view |
| 2022-03-24 | tvaishnavi | view | |
| 2022-03-24 | tvaishnavi | view |
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- places where people gain access to the Internet between 1998 and 2004 67
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... of 4 countries were all increased over period of time. In 2000, the proportion of inexhaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73529411765 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59923464913 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8709501568 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281895922453 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134079169966 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116056961418 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183542217126 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801450471544 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.