The graph below shows the purchasing of petrol by people from the United States and United Kingdom according to their salaries.
The figure elucidates the number of petrol’s purchasing by individuals in two different nations regarding their incomes from the 1st week to the 4th week. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the aspect of the persons who obtained low intakes.
To begin with, there was a significant oscillation for the amount of medium revenues’ aspect between the first week, which made up approximately at a half of 60, and the fourth week, which constituted at just across three-fourths of 40. Following the same pattern as medium incomes’ aspects, the first week to the fourth week witnessed a slight palpitation for the total of high salaries’ aspect where it, initially, stood at well under 50, and achieved to well over two-thirds of 60 by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, there was a dramatic upsurge in the total of low intakes’ aspect from the 1st week, which was roughly at four-sixths of 30, through to the 3rd week, which accounted for 90. Erratically, it plunged enormously, plummeting to 20 in the following week.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04972375691 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08533733852 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3027184554 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.333333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0379893588148 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250438944381 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465149719257 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0379365561971 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405149260528 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.