The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied line graph compares the amounts of goods transported via road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK from 1974 to 2002. Overall, throughout 28-year period, the highest amount of goods was transported via road. Pipe line, on the other hand, was the least popular used despite experiencing a slight growth.
As can be seen in the graph, in 1974, nearly 70-million tonnes of goods were delivered via road, which was much higher compared to the other types of transport. Afterwards, although the figure for road witnessed a mild volatility during 1978-1995, it still peaked at approximately 100 millions at the end of the period.
In terms of water and rail, they both had the same derivation (about 40-million tonnes of goods transported). However, after 1978 until the end of period, the figure for rail trailed that for water by few units. After that, in general, the amount of goods transported via water saw a leap to arrive at well-above 60 millions tons; while that of rail quickly recovered to the same level after a fluctuated period.
Regarding the amount of goods transported via pipeline, was the least popular one. This figure experienced a marginal rise from 5 millions in 1974 to over 20 millions in 1995, which was followed by the plateau until 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, still, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61793172743 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2265096304 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136601665241 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663094648736 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641968174146 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949852004995 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402285120467 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.