The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph illustrates how many goods transported by four different types of transport namely, Pipeline,Rail,Water,Road in British over a course of 28 years starting from 1974.
Overall, there was a downward trend in the quantity of products transported by Road ,Water, Pipeline, in the UK while the trend for Railways experienced a contrasting movement in 1994 before rising back to the same level at the end of the period. Additionally, the highest amount of goods transported via Road whereas that of Pipeline was the least commonly used groups of transportation throughout the whole period frame.
To begin, from 1974 to 1994, the number of products delivered increased slightly to just under 80 million tonnes then its continued upward trend more significantly at around 100 million tonnes. Moreover, the figure for Railways and Water was exactly similar, with both around 40 million tonnes over a period of first four years. In addition, Water transported goods which grew mildly to approximately 50 million tonnes,but later decreased a little of 10 million tonnes before growing to nearly 60 million tonnes in the last year. In contrast, Rail delivering products declined considerably at 20 million tonnes in 1994 but then climbed remarkably to roughly over 40 million tonnes in 2002. Afterwards, between 1974 and 1994, there was a steadily rise in transportation of Pipeline, at around 20 million tonnes,which was the same number with Railways which led to a leveling out until the ending.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates how many good...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Rail
...rent types of transport namely, Pipeline,Rail,Water,Road in British over a course of ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Road
...of transport namely, Pipeline,Rail,Water,Road in British over a course of 28 years st...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...course of 28 years starting from 1974. Overall, there was a downward trend in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...quantity of products transported by Road ,Water, Pipeline, in the UK while the tre...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion throughout the whole period frame. To begin, from 1974 to 1994, the number ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...ildly to approximately 50 million tonnes,but later decreased a little of 10 million ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...wards, between 1974 and 1994, there was a steadily rise in transportation of Pipeline, at aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...of Pipeline, at around 20 million tonnes,which was the same number with Railways which...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24066390041 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10126491055 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572614107884 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.21297807 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.875 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215163546866 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101652427901 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836939551175 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184577906813 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813463979635 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.