The line graph illustrates the number of commodities transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 through four types of transportation. Overall, there had been a significant growth in the quantities of transported goods over the past 3 decades.
In 1974, the quantities of goods transported by road were approximately 70 million tones, which was tenfold more than those transported through the pipeline, while both water and rail transportation way only carried almost 40 million tons of wares. Between 1975 and 2001, all numbers of goods transported by four modes increased by roughly 20 million tones except the wares carried by rail which was still fluctuating between 30 and 40 million tones.
Finally, in 2002, the number of commodities carried by all four transportation types reached their peaks. The goods transported by road and water were about 100 and 65 million tons respectively. Meanwhile, the commodities carried by pipeline were roughly 22 million tones, and interestingly, the number of goods transported by rail was 41 million tones which were almost the same as in 1974.
Provided line graph…
Provided line graph illustrates how the four transport methods have been carried the goods in the UK during the year 1974 to 2002. Overall, it can be seen that, while four modes experienced an upward trend, the road transportation was remained most popular over the time period.
On the one hand, the road transportation, which was most popular, moved nearly 70 m tonnes of goods in 1974. Thereafter, products that carried through road, experienced some fluctuations from 1978 to 1998 though it reached a high of 98 tonnes in 1998 and remained constant at the end.
Moreover, pipeline, which was least popular method of goods transport, witnessed a very small amount of 5m goods in 1994. Interestingly though, this figure reached a more than 20 m tonnes after 1994 and remained stable for next eight years.
With regard to rail and water, the amount of tons began fairly similar at 40 m tonnes in 1974, whereas after 1978, while the level of goods, which was moved through rail, increased steadily, transportation for rail plunged to 25m. However, in 2002 water and rail transferred respectively 65m and 41m of products.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21142857143 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04516210486 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3882315121 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228959225054 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13012246511 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404103230807 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184498809985 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436103423334 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.