The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
The graph illustrates the different modes of transportation for quantity goods transported since the 1974s and 2002 in the UK. The data were measured in million tonnes. Overall, it can be seen that the modes of transport of road, water, and rail experienced gradually increase while the pipeline has no change in the last period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, the number of goods delivered by road was higher than other the modes transport along twenty-eight years. the road’s mode of transportation was fluctuated, representing under 80 million tonnes. Initially, from 1974 to 1974, modes transport of water and rail began at the same levels around 40 million tonnes, yet after four years the water was a dramatic rise approximately 60 million tonnes different with rail was declined almost 25 million tonnes. At the same period, pipeline experienced a fair jump at 20 million tonnes, it was low level throughout decades.
Moreover, from the 1990s to 2002, the road, water and rail continued to grow, despite the data which were declined in the middle 1994 and 1998. Afterwards, the water remained constant during eight years about 60 million tonnes. Subsequently, both rail and road had a similar pattern which grew dramatically to finish the period. following by pipeline did no change at 20 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...02 in the UK. The data were measured in million tonnes. Overall, it can be seen that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...des transport along twenty-eight years. the road’s mode of transportation was fluct...
^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...grew dramatically to finish the period. following by pipeline did no change at 20 million...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15740740741 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77034499394 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6838775129 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232540648327 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100615568902 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155360468876 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185638377155 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144950719294 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.