The line graph depicts the information about the quantities of products transported in the UK from 1974 to 2022 by four distinct transport such as road, water, rail, pipeline. Data is calibrated in million tonnes.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that in starting 2 years, goods transport was near about 70 by road, in 1982 slowly declined and then 1986 to 1994 saw grew up, in next year then again declined, and in last year goods transported by road system touched peak level. In contrast, products transport was by water 40 in initial year in next year transport was same, in 1982 checked inclined and reached under 60 then 1982 to 1994 transport was unchanged, in 1998 saw slowly declined and in last year transport inclined and reached above 60.
The line further collates that goods transport by rail near 40 in former year, in 1978 to 1994 saw fluctuation, in last 2 years transport was again nearly reached on 40. However, in 1974 transport was negligible by pipeline, 1978 to 1994 transport was under 20 but in 1998 to 2002 transport was nearly 20.
Overall, goods were transport in UK maximum by road and minimum by pipeline in given line chart.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
..., rail, pipeline. Data is calibrated in million tonnes. After analyzing, it can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nged, in 1998 saw slowly declined and in last year transport inclined and reached...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51811487774 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0410608911 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295809571329 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15792173473 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903439952999 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208633604706 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509406141985 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.