The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The data given in the line graph depict the number of goods transported by four methods of transport in British over the span of 28 years.
Overall, while the figures for products transferred by road, sea way and pipeline witnessed upward trends, there was dramatic fluctuation in goods transported by rail way. It is a clear evident that people used road the most in carrying goods.
In the year 1974, the quantity of goods transited by road started at 70 million tones, it experienced slight oscillation before reaching a peak at just under 100 million tones in 2002. On the contrary, pipeline was rarely used for transportation, it transferred just round 5 million tones of goods in 1974. Nevertheless, this number increased sharply to approximately 22 million tones in 1995 before remaining steady until the end of the period.
The figures for products transported by rail and sea way stood at 40 and 39 respectively. However, whereas goods carried by train climbed rapidly to just over the initial quantity in 2002 after hitting a low of 25 million tones in 1995; there was a rocket in shipping. The figure for sea way shot up to 56 million tones by 1982, leveled out for next 10 years and dropped moderately before surging up to 65 million tones in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83486238532 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71804377685 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573394495413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1476865671 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182305961272 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08012338884 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747260836241 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130681825546 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076423056306 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.