The given line graph illustrates the number of commodities transported by four kinds of transportation in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
By and large, exclusive of the transport of rail, the remained three kinds of transport saw upward trend in terms of the amount of items between the given years.
Turning to the detail, nearly 70 million tonnes of goods were transported by the road in 1974, as opposed to the pipeline, which merely accounted for under 10 million tonnes. The quantity of commodity transported by the road reached a pinnacle of just below 100 million tonnes in 2002, although it fluctuated throughout the given period. By the same token, with regard to the transportation of pipeline, after increasing gradually over 10 million tonnes between 1978 and 1982, the number then continued to grow progressively until 1995, when it reached a plateau of slightly over 20 million tonnes. Since then, this figure remained unchanged until the rest of the given period.
The most striking point is that the number of the goods transported by the water intersected with that of the rail, standing at 40 million tonnes in 1978. The amount of goods transported by the water outstripped that of the rail and culminated at around 65 million tonnes in 2002, although it was the penultimate number among the four types of transportation in 1974.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...onnes between 1978 and 1982, the number then continued to grow progressively until 1...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, by and large, with regard to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98230088496 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78973089754 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2095608425 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.75 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338615347678 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163336138331 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113756758621 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238610404362 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931483587618 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.