The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph compares the quantities of goods transported by different modes of transport in the UK from 1974 to 2002, a period of 26 years.
Overall, it can be seen that road was the most popular modes to transported goods in the UK, whilst pipeline was the least popular among four.
To begin, goods transported by road and pipeline showed similar pattern, with both gradually increased from 1974 to 2002. However, the road transport was significantly higher than that of other modes of transport over this time frame. In 1974, goods transported by road stood at around 70 million tonnes, while only 5 million tonnes products were transported by pipeline. The goods transported by roads increased gradually until it reached a peak in the final year of around 100 million tonnes. Pipeline modes also increased steadily to finish at just over 20 million tonnes in 2002.
The water and rail transport began with the same leveled around 40 million tonnes goods were transported in the UK. In 1878 to 1982, the mode of water transport was slightly increased, and it remained same until 1990. In 2002, over 60 millon tonnes goods was transported by water. In contrast, the rail transport fall over the 20 years, and then it gradually rised to almost 40 million tonnes goods were transported in final year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tonnes goods was transported by water. In contrast, the rail transport fall over ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...goods were transported in final year.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90540540541 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55451479074 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9110815396 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452321450865 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206737448478 0.103423049105 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119023184698 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325378098804 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134848336801 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.