The graph compares the transported goods amount several means of transport in the UK in the year from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, the highest position was taken by road transport throughout the period, while the pipeline stayed the least. Three means of transport increased with the year, while the rail followed the opposite trend.
To begin with, the preferred method of transporting product is road and it started its journey from 70 million tonnes and increased moderately from 1974 to 1996. However, it experienced a surge at the beginning of 1997 to reach the highest position of the whole graph, which is just under hundred. Next, the means of water and rail started from approximately same place at 40 million tonnes. Though they are maintaining a stable trend since their beginning, it finished with an opposite trend. Transportation through water was faced increase where it's counterparts showed a decline until reaching at the end year. The difference between them is about 20 million in the last year 2002.
On the other hand, goods transported pipeline is remained the last position, though it was rising with year. In 1974, it was carrying just a tiny person about 3 million tonnes and after climbing every year it reached at just over 20 million tonnes. Moreover, it was just quite similar proportion with rail transport in 1995 only for 3 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'several means'.
Suggestion: several means
...h compares the transported goods amount several means of transport in the UK in the year from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00873362445 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59118704465 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2390954117 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5833333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172784259691 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758563127155 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773299351496 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142970278048 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929587070793 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.