The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992.

The line graph illustrates how the UK population watching TV and Listening to radio fluctuated during the day in 1992.

Generally, the most striking feature was that the figure for TV audiences outnumbered that for radio ones.

It is clear from the chart that in the very beginning of the day, just over 5% was the percentage of radio, whereas no one watched TV. from 6 am to just gone1pm , the data of Radio rose 4 times to appropriately a quarter, the highest point, at 8:30 before witnessing a downward trend. By comparison, during the same period of time, there was a gradual increase in the quantity of tv viewers With no sudden change until it reached an equal point to that of Radio listeners, at roughly 16%.

the period from then to just gone 3 am the next days saw a contrary, with the figure for TV hitting a peak of nearly a half in the primetime from 6 to 9 am, followed by a sharp decline to a mere3%. Meanwhile, the proportion of those who listened to radio continued its tendency to fall.
Afterwards, TV and radio shared similar figures, leveling off at around 3%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ne watched TV. from 6 am to just gone1pm , the data of Radio rose 4 times to appro...
^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d trend. By comparison, during the same period of time, there was a gradual increase in the qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...f Radio listeners, at roughly 16%. the period from then to just gone 3 am the ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54822335025 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63512490733 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1467722489 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155160030285 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741186743897 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541938561295 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963062638813 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566487722836 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.