The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given chart compares the variations in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables. sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks over a thirty-year period from 1979 to 2009. Generally, the overall price started from about 60 points and rose for all three items along with consumer index during the research period.
As can be seen, all price followed the same trend. In the first haft of the period, from 1979 to 1985, the price of three products and consumer-price index stayed at the same range approximately 100 points. Then, in the second haft of the period, between 1985 and 2009, there was a rise in all of them.
In the graph, the fresh fruits and vegetables not only rose sharply but also fluctuated than other. It reached a peak of about 340 points in 2008. After that, it went through a slight decrease in 2009. But the price was far above consumer-price index.
In the year 1982, the price of sugars and sweets increased steadily, but it fell rapidly in next two years. Then, it went up gradually over the next of the period and to the highest point in 2009.
The price of carbonated drinks increased at a small rate over the time period and the highest price was observed in 2009.
Overall, the consumer price index was linearly gradually increasing since 1978. The fastest and the slowest price increased product were fruits and vegetables, and carbohydrate respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sugar
...e price of fresh fruits and vegetables. sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks over a...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60209424084 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39005092239 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7231374578 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.25 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171163750969 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659005914299 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443942945929 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104889516987 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424267148264 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.