The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country.

The given line chart illustrates the differences and alternatives in trade profits of three distinct kind of book: children's book, adult fiction and educational books during a period of 6 years from 2002 to 2006.

Overall, book for children and education related underwent an upward trend whereas, adult fiction had a dramatic decrease.

In 2002, adult fiction was on top with a sale of 45 million dollars, followed by children's book at 33 million dollars and educational books at 25 million dollars. After some fluctuations, the money derived from selling adult novel plunged to 30 million dollars in 2006. In contrast, with the third place in the beginning, educational books passed adult fiction with the number of sale revenue of 32 million dollars in 2006, despite of a drop in the medium period of the research.

Although the fluctuation of two kind of books mentioned above, children's book witnessed a constant increase during the research. In particular, the sale of this category of books stood at 32 million dollars in 2002 before rose sharply to 42 million dollars in 2003. From 2003 to 2005, there was a slight growth in sale of children's book by 5 million dollars, but by the end, sales soar to 66 million dollars, which archived the first place.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...ives in trade profits of three distinct kind of book: childrens book, adult fiction ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...rch. Although the fluctuation of two kind of books mentioned above, childrens boo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, third, whereas, in contrast, in particular, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95774647887 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64213739897 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3243804369 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301024194411 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152606126249 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648403622958 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212003961465 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443674160399 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.