The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.

The given linear graph highlights the information about the spending patterns of conducting research in four distinct countries: Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and Uk. The data is calibrated in per centum.

Overall, it is evident that most of the money had been spended into the renewable sources of energy in Spain, while rest of the countriesfollowed a fluctuating trend in spending.
It can be seen that spending on renewable sources of all countries were started from 50$ in the year 1975. Moreover, Switzerland had experienced a drastic increase in spending of conducting research which reached to the peak at 6$. Furthermore, 1$ was spend by the persons into research of renewable sources in Denmark in the year 1980, this figure remained constant till 1990 and then climbed until last year.

As far as trend was concerned, it is possible yo see the fluctuations in the figure of Spain and Uk. In addition to this, in the year 1990 and 1995, the spending on renewable sources in Spain was below 1$ and 1$ respectively. Then, it inclimbed and again declined 10 years later. The spending in Uk was not even reached above 1$ over the given period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
...rces of all countries were started from 50$ in the year 1975. Moreover, Switzerland...
^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$6'.
Suggestion: $6
...g research which reached to the peak at 6$. Furthermore, 1$ was spend by the perso...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...reached to the peak at 6$. Furthermore, 1$ was spend by the persons into research ...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... to the peak at 6$. Furthermore, 1$ was spend by the persons into research of renewab...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 203, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...on renewable sources in Spain was below 1$ and 1$ respectively. Then, it inclimbed...
^^
Line 6, column 210, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...wable sources in Spain was below 1$ and 1$ respectively. Then, it inclimbed and ag...
^^
Line 6, column 327, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...ending in Uk was not even reached above 1$ over the given period.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87321393511 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8035660058 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214273290966 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907863198007 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516430627949 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130561018329 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370046133006 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.